Legal Governance of Genome-Editing Technologies for Human Gene and Cell Therapies in Singapore

In Jochen Taupitz & Silvia Deuring (eds.), Rechtliche Aspekte der Genom-Editierung an der Menschlichen Keimbahn : A Comparative Legal Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 363-387 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter provides an analysis of the legal governance that applies to genome-editing technologies for human biomedical research and cell therapies in Singapore. Genome-editing technologies refer to a group of techniques that include CRISPR/Cas9, which is a technological tool by which gene locus can be altered to create a specific genetic modification at that precise locus. For the purposes of this chapter, reference to gene-editing technologies includes techniques that could modify the genetic composition of a human cell. The ability to apply such techniques to human somatic and germline cells can eventually offer therapeutic opportunities to treat severe hereditary diseases by repairing the disease-causing gene. With a few exceptions, gene-editing technologies remain technically challenging and complex to implement safely and effectively at the time of writing, mainly because of fundamental limitations in the ability to precisely control how genetic material can be altered or introduced into cells. In other words, safety continues to be the foremost of concerns if such technologies are to be administered as clinical practice. Apart from concerns about physical wellbeing, gene-editing technologies have also raised concerns that relate to eugenics as they can be applied for non-therapeutic purposes or otherwise for the purposes of genetic enhancement. This chapter discusses the legal responses in Singapore to these and related concerns as legal governance of an emergent biomedical technology. Legal governance refers not only to statutory laws and regulations, but also to ethical principles, recommendations and good practices that either have regulatory effect or represent the legal or regulatory ends of legal requirements that apply to the use of genome-editing technologies in Singapore.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
A Path Through the Morass.Giulia Cavaliere - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 203-225.
Human Germline Genome Editing in the Clinical Context.Giovanni Rubeis - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 149-160.
Global bioethics.Carolyn P. Neuhaus - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (6):inside front cover-inside front.
Genome Editing for Longer Lives: The Problem of Loneliness.C. S. Wareham - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):309-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
6 (#1,425,536)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references