Abstract
Hume's argument concerning miracles is interpreted by making approximations to terms in Bayes's theorem. This formulation is then used to analyse the impact of multiple testimony. Individual testimonies which are ‘non-miraculous’ in Hume's sense can in principle be accumulated to yield a high probability both for the occurrence of a single miracle and for the occurrence of at least one of a set of miracles. Conditions are given under which testimony for miracles may provide support for the existence of God.
Keywords Hume
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/49.1.49
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,147
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Weaker Condition for Transitivity in Probabilistic Support.William A. Roche - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):111-118.
A Condition for Transitivity in Probabilistic Support.Tomoji Shogenji - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (4):613-616.
Hume and the Independent Witnesses.Arif Ahmed - 2015 - Mind 124 (496):1013-1044.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Martin on Miracles.Michael Almeida - 2007 - Philo 10 (1):27-34.
Religious Experience.Travis Dumsday - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):371-379.
Mackie's Treatment of Miracles.Richard Otte - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151-158.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
214 ( #37,393 of 2,324,675 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #461,830 of 2,324,675 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes