Hume Studies 28 (1):3-25 (2002)

Thomas Holden
University of California at Santa Barbara
According to a standard interpretation of Hume’s argument against infinite divisibility, Hume is raising a purely formal problem for mathematical constructions of infinite divisibility, divorced from all thought of the stuffing or filling of actual physical continua. I resist this. Hume’s argument must be understood in the context of a popular early modern account of the metaphysical status of the parts of physical quantities. This interpretation disarms the standard mathematical objections to Hume’s reasoning; I also defend it on textual and contextual grounds.
Keywords Hume  continua  infinite divisibility  atomism  minima sensibilia
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2002
DOI hume20022813
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hume and the Perception of Spatial Magnitude.Edward Slowik - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):355 - 373.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

From Inexactness to Certainty: The Change in Hume's Conception of Geometry.Vadim Batitsky - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):1-20.
Infinite Divisibility in Hume's "Treatise".A. Flew - 1967 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 22 (4):457.
Hume on Infinite Divisibility.Donald L. M. Baxter - 1988 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (2):133-140.
Hume's Theory of Space and Time in its Sceptical Context.Donald L. M. Baxter - 2009 - In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press.
Hume on Infinite Divisibility and Sensible Extensionless Indivisibles.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1):61-78.
Atomism and Infinite Divisibility.Ralph Edward Kenyon - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst


Added to PP index

Total views
94 ( #115,814 of 2,454,441 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,269 of 2,454,441 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes