Intentions, response-dependence, and immunity from error

In P. Menzies (ed.), Response Dependent Concepts. ANU Working Papers in Philosophy 1 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

You are, I suspect, exceedingly good at knowing what you intend to do. In saying this I pay you no special compliment. Knowing what one intends is the normal state to be in. And this cries out for some explanation. How is it that we are so authoritative about our own intentions? There are two different approaches that one can take in answering this question. The first credits us with special perceptual powers which we use when we examine our own minds. On this view we detect our own mental states in much the same way that we detect the state of the world around us; but the powers we direct inward are much less prone t o error than those we direct outwards. The alternative approach denies that there is such a thing as inward perception. On this view the whole idea the we detect our own mental states using some kind of internal perceptual apparatus is misguided; a wholly different account is needed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acceptance-dependence: A social kind of response-dependence.Frank A. Hindriks - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Intention detecting.Richard Holton - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):298-318.
Intentions are mental states.Jing Zhu & Andrei A. Buckareff - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (2):235 – 242.
Thought insertion and immunity to error through misidentification.Annalisa Coliva - 2002 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (1):27-34.
'I'-thoughts and explanation: Reply to Garrett.Jose Luis Bermudez - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):432–436.
How we know what we intend.Sarah K. Paul - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (2):327-346.
Biological functions and perceptual content.Mohan Matthen - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (January):5-27.
Rational and Irrational Intentions: An Argument for Externalism.Wilhelm Vossenkuhl - 2002 - In Verena Mayer & Sabine A. Döring (eds.), Die Moralität der Gefühle. De Gruyter. pp. 163-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#198,934)

6 months
10 (#187,567)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Holton
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

Truth, Meaning, and Circularity.Claire Horisk - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):269-300.
Two conceptions of response-dependence.Rafael De Clercq - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159-177.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references