Not just autonomy--the principles of American biomedical ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):332-338 (1995)
Abstract
The Principles of Biomedical Ethics by Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress which is now in its fourth edition has had a great influence on the development of bioethics through its exposition of a theory based on the four principles: respect for autonomy; non-maleficence; beneficence, and justice (1). The theory is developed as a common-morality theory, and the present paper attempts to show how this approach, starting from American common-morality, leads to an underdevelopment of beneficence and justice, and that the methods offered for specification and balancing of principles are inadequateDOI
10.1136/jme.21.6.332
My notes
Similar books and articles
Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Peter N. Herissone-Kelly - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (10):584-587.
Autonomy, subject-relativity, and subjective and objective theories of well-being in bioethics.Jukka Varelius - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):363-379.
Limits of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics? Conceptual Clarifications.Theda Rehbock - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):524-532.
Homeopathy and Medical Ethics.David Shaw - 2011 - Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies 16 (1):17-21.
The range of autonomy: Informed consent in medicine.Alfred D. Beasley & Glenn C. Graber - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn.: Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Oxford University Press, 2001, pound19.95, pp 454. ISBN 0-19-514332-. [REVIEW]S. Holm - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):332-a-332.
Will biomedical enhancements undermine solidarity, responsibility, equality and autonomy?L. E. V. Ori - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (4):177-184.
A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics.J. R. Karlsen & J. H. Solbakk - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (10):588-591.
Will biomedical enhancements undermine solidarity, responsibility, equality and autonomy?Ori Lev - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (4):177-184.
Different approaches to principles of biomedical ethics : a philosophical analysis and discussion of the theories of the American ethicists Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress and the Danish philosophers Jakob Rendtorff & Peter Kemp.Mette Ebbesen - 2010 - In Tyler N. Pace (ed.), Bioethics: Issues and Dilemmas. Nova Science Publishers.
Principlism, medical individualism, and health promotion in resource-poor countries: can autonomy-based bioethics promote social justice and population health? [REVIEW]Jacquineau Azétsop & Stuart Rennie - 2010 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5:1.
The possibility of a universal declaration of biomedical ethics.K. M. Hedayat - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):17-20.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-13
Downloads
59 (#202,987)
6 months
2 (#300,121)
2010-09-13
Downloads
59 (#202,987)
6 months
2 (#300,121)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Thinking ethical and regulatory frameworks in medicine from the perspective of solidarity on both sides of the Atlantic.Barbara Prainsack & Alena Buyx - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (6):489-501.
Justice and the Possibility of Good Moralism in Bioethics.Matti Häyry - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (2):236-263.
European values in bioethics: Why, what, and how to be used. [REVIEW]Matti Häyry - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):199-214.
Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics.D. F. Tsai - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):315-321.
For and against the four principles of biomedical ethics.Richard Huxtable - 2013 - Clinical Ethics 8 (2-3):39-43.
References found in this work
Philosophical Medical Ethics.R. S. Downie & Ranaan Gillon - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149):461.