The Problem of Intransigently Biased Agents

Philosophy of Science 82 (5):956-968 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In recent years the social nature of scientific inquiry has generated considerable interest. We examine the effect of an epistemically impure agent on a community of honest truth seekers. Extending a formal model of network epistemology pioneered by Zollman, we conclude that an intransigently biased agent prevents the community from ever converging to the truth. We explore two solutions to this problem, including a novel procedure for endogenous network formation in which agents choose whom to trust. We contend that our model nicely captures aspects of current problems in medical research and gesture at some morals for medical epistemology more generally



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,408

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Complementarity of behavioral biases.Toru Suzuki - 2012 - Theory and Decision 72 (3):413-430.


Added to PP

51 (#273,463)

6 months
12 (#120,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bennett Holman
Yonsei University
Justin Bruner
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

Scientific polarization.Cailin O’Connor & James Owen Weatherall - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):855-875.
Experimentation by Industrial Selection.Bennett Holman & Justin Bruner - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1008-1019.
Robustness and Idealizations in Agent-Based Models of Scientific Interaction.Daniel Frey & Dunja Šešelja - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1411-1437.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations