Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):417-418 (2001)
The use of high hypothetical payoffs has been justified by the realism and relevance of large monetary consequences and by the impracticality of making high cash payments. We argue that subjects may not be able to imagine how they would behave in high payoff situations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Why Liberals Should Accept Financial Incentives for Organ Procurement.Robert M. Veatch - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (1):19-36.
What's Wrong with the Treadway Commission Report? Experimental Analyses of the Effects of Personal Values and Codes of Conduct on Fraudulent Financial Reporting.Arthur P. Brief, Janet M. Dukerich, Paul R. Brown & Joan F. Brett - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):183 - 198.
Ethics in Human Subjects Research: Do Incentives Matter?Ruth W. Grant & Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):717 – 738.
The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments.Susanne Bobzien - 1997 - Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.
The Ethics of Incentives: Historical Origins and Contemporary Understandings.Ruth W. Grant - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):111-139.
Why Use Real and Hypothetical Payoffs?Anton Kühberger - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):419-420.
Monetary Incentives, What Are They Good For?Daniel Read - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):265-276.
Time Scales of Observation and Ontological Levels of Reality.Alexey Alyushin - 2010 - Axiomathes 20 (4):439-460.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #563,676 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #112,524 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?