What is our “canon”? How american intellectual historians debate the core of their field

Modern Intellectual History 9 (1):185-200 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

British Marxist Historians: An Appraisal.Antony Kalashnikov - 2013 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 4 (1).
Will Philosophers Study Their History, Or Become History?Laurie Shrage - 2008 - Radical Philosophy Review 11 (2):125-150.
What can history do for bioethics?Duncan Wilson - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (4):215-223.
Weak Historicism: On Hierarchies of Intellectual Virtues and Goods.Herman Paul - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (3):369-388.
Durkheim's philosophy lectures: notes from the Lycée de Sens course, 1883-1884.Emile Durkheim - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Neil Gross, Robert Alun Jones & André Lalande.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
38 (#408,165)

6 months
21 (#122,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New Directions in American Intellectual History.John Higham & Paul K. Conkin - 1981 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 17 (4):387-391.

Add more references