Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):215–236 (2000)
At Treatise 581ff., Hume seems to ground moral distinctions in therational deliberations of the observer, thereby making sentiment expendable.Is Hume then an example of an early modern ethicist, for whom moral distinctions are derived from reason alone? I argue that Hume's use of strategiesfrom ancient ethics can help explain how reason remains subordinate to sentiment.For if to take up the point of view of the judicious spectator we musthave the right constellation of sentiments and passions , then moral distinctions are only derivatively based onreason
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
'The Modern Disciple of the Academy': Hume, Shelley, and Sir William Drummond.Thomas Holden - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2):161-188.
David Hume on Monetary Policy: A Retrospective Approach.Maria Pia Paganelli - 2009 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (1):65-85.
Introduction to World Philosophy: A Multicultural Reader.Daniel A. Bonevac (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Virtue, Norms, and Objectivity: Issues in Ancient and Modern Ethics.Christopher Gill (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #286,871 of 2,177,961 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,961 )
How can I increase my downloads?