Asian Philosophy 20 (2):159-174 (2010)

Chien-hsing Ho
Academia Sinica, Taiwan
This essay attempts to provide a systematic reconstruction of Nāgārjuna's philosophical thought by understanding it as a critique of the attachment to linguistic expressions and their referents. We first present an outline of Nāgārjuna's philosophy, centering on such notions as 'dependent origination', 'emptiness' and 'self-nature'. Then we discuss Nāgārjuna's dismissal of a metaphysical use of language, particularly his contention that language can function well without assuming the reality of its referents. We also consider his statement that he has no assertion and explain his provisional use of language. Towards the end of the essay, we direct our attention to a paradoxical formula in a Buddhist sutra that should help in evaluating the contemporary significance of Nāgārjuna's linguistic critique
Keywords emptiness  Nāgārjuna  critique of language  provisional expression
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09552367.2010.484952
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,374
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Identity and Difference.Martin Heidegger - 1969 - New York: Harper & Row.
Philosophy of Language.William P. Alston - 1964 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
122 ( #81,769 of 2,420,349 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,912 of 2,420,349 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes