The purpose of this paper is to give a brief survey the implications of the theories of modern physics for the doctrine of determinism. The survey will reveal a curious feature of determinism: in some respects it is fragile, requiring a number of enabling assumptions to give it a fighting chance; but in other respects it is quite robust and very difficult to kill. The survey will also aim to show that, apart from its own intrinsic interest, determinism is an excellent device for probing the foundations of classical, relativistic, and quantum physics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Conspectus of Determinism.Ted Honderich - 1970 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 191:191-216.
The Consequences of Determinism: A Theory of Determinism, Volume 2.Ted Honderich - 1990 - Clarendon Press.
How Free Are You? The Determinism Problem.Ted Honderich - 2002 - In Robert H. Kane (ed.), Philosophical Quarterly. Oxford University Press. pp. 249.
Anvil or Onion? Determinism as a Layered Concept.Robert C. Bishop - 2005 - Erkenntnis 63 (1):55 - 71.
Determinism: What We Have Learned and What We Still Don't Know.John Earman - 2004 - In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press. pp. 21--46.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #136,868 of 2,146,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,104 of 2,146,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.