Measurement of the Vertical Spatial Metaphor of Power Concepts Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure


Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01422
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,524
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Six Views of Embodied Cognition.Margaret Wilson - 2002 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (4):625--636.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Appeal to Robustness in Measurement Practice.Alessandra Basso - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 65:57-66.
Why Gauge?Carlo Rovelli - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (1):91-104.
Relational Proof Systems for Spatial Reasoning.Joanna Golińska-Pilarek & Ewa Orlowska - 2006 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 16 (3-4):409-431.
Power, Freedom, and Relational Autonomy.Ericka Tucker - forthcoming - In Aurelia Armstrong, Keith Green & Andrea Sangiacomo (eds.), Spinoza and Relational Autonomy. Edinburgh, UK: pp. 149-163.
Good Use of a ‘Bad’ Metaphor.Jesper Haglund - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (3-4):205-214.
Spatial Metaphors for Morality: A Perspective From Chinese.Ning Yu - 2016 - Metaphor and Symbol 31 (2):108-125.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-28

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature