Privacy, the individual and genetic information: A buddhist perspective

Bioethics 23 (7):403-412 (2009)
Abstract
Bioinformatics is a new field of study whose ethical implications involve a combination of bioethics, computer ethics and information ethics. This paper is an attempt to view some of these implications from the perspective of Buddhism. Privacy is a central concern in both computer/information ethics and bioethics, and with information technology being increasingly utilized to process biological and genetic data, the issue has become even more pronounced. Traditionally, privacy presupposes the individual self but as Buddhism does away with the ultimate conception of an individual self, it has to find a way to analyse and justify privacy that does not presuppose such a self. It does this through a pragmatic conception that does not depend on a positing of the substantial self, which is then found to be unnecessary for an effective protection of privacy. As it may be possible one day to link genetic data to individuals, the Buddhist conception perhaps offers a more flexible approach, as what is considered to be integral to an individual person is not fixed in objectivity but depends on convention.
Keywords genetics  Buddhism  bioinformatics  privacy  individual
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01716.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,749
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Informational Privacy, Data Mining, and the Internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
Inaccuracy as a Privacy-Enhancing Tool.Gloria González Fuster - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):87-95.
Is There a Duty to Remain in Ignorance?Iain Brassington - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):101-115.
The Journalist and Privacy.Louis Hodges - 1994 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (4):197 – 212.
Privacy and Discrete "Social Spheres".Jonathan Schonscheck - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (3):221 – 228.
Privacy and the Human Genome Project.David L. Wiesenthal & Neil I. Wiener - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):189 – 202.
Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Added to PP index
2009-04-23

Total downloads
37 ( #144,268 of 2,197,362 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,877 of 2,197,362 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature