Republicanism in Theory and Practice
Iseult Honohan & Jeremy Jennings (eds.)
Routledge (2015)
Abstract
Recent claims that civic republicanism can better address contemporary political problems than either liberalism or communitarianism are generating an intense debate. This is a sharp insight into this debate, confronting normative theory with historical and comparative analysis. It examines whether republican theory can address contemporary political problems in ways that are both valuable and significantly different in practice from liberalism. These expert authors offer contrasting perspectives on issues raised by the contemporary revival of republicanism and adopt a variety of methodological approaches to address the practical implications of republican thought within a coherent thematic framework. This book also *clarifies core themes and contested areas of republican thought, especially the notion of liberty, the specific political institutions needed to realize it, and the nature of solidarity among citizens. * shows how republicanism continued to influence the development of liberal thought in nineteenth century Britain * examines the development of alternative republican discourses, including the established political practice and ideology of the French republican tradition * applies republican perspectives to contemporary political concerns such as the creation of social trust and the expansion of public accountability * explores the implications of republican theory for policy areas including houses, education and marriage in diverse multicultural societies This book will be of great interest to researchers and students studying republicanism in political science history, social policy and education. In addition, it is a valuable resource for those concerned with citizenship, democratic theory, multiculturalism, nationalism and patriotism, and politics beyond the nation-stateAuthor's Profile
ISBN(s)
9781138985209 1138985201 0415357365
My notes
Similar books and articles
Toward global republican citizenship?Waldemar Hanasz - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):282-302.
Für eine republikanische Kultur der Freiheit. Machiavellis klassischer Republikanismus.Philipp Hölzing - 2008 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 94 (4):512-525.
Intellectual Founders of the Republic: Five Studies in Nineteenth Century French Political Thought.Sudhir Hazareesingh - 2001 - Oxford University Press UK.
A National Identity Republicanism?Laura Andronache - 2006 - European Journal of Political Theory 5 (4):399-414.
J. G. A. Pocock's republicanism and political theory: A critique and reinterpretation.Ian Shapiro - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (3):433-471.
Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives.Samantha Besson & José Luis Martí (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives.Samantha Besson & José Luis Martí (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Intellectual Origins of Modern Democratic Republicanism (1660–1720).Jonathan Israel - 2004 - European Journal of Political Theory 3 (1):7-36.
The Republican critique of capitalism.Stuart White - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):561-579.
Cicerón descuartizado, Cicerón en un fractal: nota sobre el republicanismo contemporáneo.Cristóbal Orrego - 2001 - Anuario Filosófico 34 (70):395-432.
The cosmopolitan scope of republican citizenship.Ryoa Chung - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):135-154.
Adam Smith's Republican Moment: Lessons for Today's Emancipatory Thought.David Cassass - 2013 - Economic Thought 2 (2):1.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-01-20
Downloads
1 (#1,500,365)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2016-01-20
Downloads
1 (#1,500,365)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Political realism meets civic republicanism.Philip Pettit - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3):331-347.
'Explicating ways of consensus-making: Distinguishing the academic, the interface and the meta-consensus.Laszlo Kosolosky & Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2014 - In Carlo Martini (ed.), Experts and Consensus in Social Science. Berlin: Springer. pp. 71-92.
The Eurocentrism of neo-Roman republicanism and the neglect of republican empire.Kevin Blachford - 2021 - Thesis Eleven 166 (1):136-150.