Some ulpian texts attributed to Paul

Abstract

This article* concerns some texts attributed in the Digest to Paul but which seem really to be texts of Ulpian. The reason for thinking that these texts are wrongly inscribed is mainly the difference in style between the two writers, but also turns in part on the way in which Digest titles were constructed. Moreover differences of style are not ultimately distinct from differences in legal outlook.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,826

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Die Episode des Palamedes in den byzantinischen Progymnasmata.Ilias Taxidis - 2009 - Byzantinische Zeitschrift 102 (2):731-737.
Religion and Artificial Intelligence.Alireza Ghaeminia - 2011 - Transcendent Philosophy Journal 12:185-200.
Darśanamañjarī.R. Thangaswami Sarma - 1985 - [Madras]: University of Madras.
Power and Complexity in Legal Genres: Unveiling Insurance Policies and Arbitration Rules.María Ángeles Orts - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (3):485-505.
Did Paul and Ulpian Disagree?Bernard H. Stolte - 1984 - Mnemosyne 37 (1-2):152-154.
The Syntactic Features of Islamic Legal Texts and Their Syntactic Implications for Translation.Rafat Y. Alwazna - 2022 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (5):1689-1710.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
13 (#1,476,518)

6 months
13 (#354,588)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references