The Disenhancement Problem in Agriculture: A Reply to Thompson [Book Review]

NanoEthics 6 (1):47-54 (2012)

Soraj Hongladarom
Chulalongkorn University
The Disenhancement Problem in Agriculture: A Reply to Thompson Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-8 DOI 10.1007/s11569-012-0138-2 Authors Soraj Hongladarom, Department of Philosophy and Center for Ethics of Science and Technology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand Journal NanoEthics Online ISSN 1871-4765 Print ISSN 1871-4757
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-012-0138-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,172
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Nature of Buddhist Ethics.Damien Keown - 1992 - St. Martin's Press.
Food, Self and Identity.C. Fischler - 1988 - Social Science Information 27 (2):275-292.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animals and Technoscience.Christopher Coenen - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (1):1-4.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Confining ‘Disenhanced’ Animals.John Hadley - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):41-46.
Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):281-287.
Feminism and Farming: A Response to Paul Thompson’s the Agrarian Vision. [REVIEW]Erin McKenna - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):529-534.


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #436,754 of 2,253,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #795,528 of 2,253,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature