Aristotle on the Category of Relation

Upa (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Aristotle on the Category of Relation, Pamela Hood challenges the view that Aristotle's conception of relation is so divergent from our own that it does not count as a theory of relation at all. This book presents compelling evidence that Aristotle's theory of relation is more robust than originally suspected

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on the Category of Relation (review).Roderick T. Long - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):149-150.
Substance and Independence in Aristotle.Phil Corkum - 2013 - In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag. pp. 36-67.
Aristotle's metaphysics of morals.Eugene Garver - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1):7-28.
Essays on Aristotle's De anima.Martha Craven Nussbaum & Amélie Rorty (eds.) - 1995 [1992] - New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
49 (#310,442)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pamela Hood
San Francisco State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references