Analysis 54 (2):92 - 97 (1994)

Brad Hooker
University of Reading
Some things aren't what their names suggest. This is true of rubber ducks, stool pigeons, clay pigeons, hot dogs, and clothes horses. Frances Howard-Snyder's "Rule Consequentialism is a Rubber Duck" ("APQ", 30 (1993) 271-78) argues that the answer is Yes. Howard-Snyder thinks rule-consequentialism is a form of deontology, not a form of consequentialism. This thought is understandable: many recent definitions of consequentialism are such as to invite it. Thinking rule-consequentialism inferior to act-consequentialism, many philosophers, when discussing consequentialism, have had act-consequentialism in mind. Having just one kind of consequentialism in mind has led them to offer definitions of consequentialism that are really definitions of just act-consequentialism. My paper discusses three different possible definitions of consequentialism and defends one that does justice to rule-consequentialism's family membership
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/54.2.92
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Human Good and the Ambitions of Consequentialism.James Griffin - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):118.
Rule Consequentialism Is a Rubber Duck.Frances Howard-Snyder - 1993 - American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):271 - 278.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Impartiality.Troy Jollimore - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):857-876.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rule Consequentialism Is a Rubber Duck.Frances Howard-Snyder - 1993 - American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):271 - 278.
Rule-Consequentialism's Dilemma.Iain Law - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):263-276.
Variable Versus Fixed-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Brad Hooker & Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):344–352.
A Refutation of Consequentialism.Robert Guay - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):348-362.
Rule-Consequentialism and Obligations Toward the Needy.Brad Hooker - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):19–33.
Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness.Brad Hooker - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:19 - 35.
A Dilemma for Rule-Consequentialism.Jussi Suikkanen - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (1):141-150.


Added to PP index

Total views
141 ( #74,299 of 62,268 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 62,268 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes