Journal of Animal Ethics 4 (2):86-92 (2014)

Daniel Hooley
Capilano University
In this article I review Can Animals be Moral? by Mark Rowlands. I outline the central arguments made by Rowlands in defence of his thesis that other animals can be moral subjects and I compare this claim to other who have held that animals can act morally. I finish by raising a couple worries with Rowlands' arguments and note some areas for further inquiry.
Keywords animals  animal ethics  moral agency  morality  normativity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5406/janimalethics.4.2.0086
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Animals Be Moral? [REVIEW]Andy Lamey - 2013 - Scope 2013 (September 17).
Responding to Animals.Mark Rowlands - 2010 - Common Knowledge 16 (2):351-360.
Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Moral Agency in Other Animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Animals and Moral Motivation: A Response to Clement. Rowlands - 2013 - Journal of Animal Ethics 3 (1):15.
Humans and Other Animals.Howard Sankey - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):367 – 368.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #259,975 of 2,461,918 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,599 of 2,461,918 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes