Rule-consequentialism and internal consistency: A reply to card

Utilitas 19 (4):514-519 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rule-consequentialism has been accused of either collapsing into act-consequentialism or being internally inconsistent. I have tried to develop a form of rule-consequentialism without these flaws. In this June's issue of Utilitas, Robert Card argued that I have failed. Here I assess his arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Rule-Consequentialism a Rubber Duck?Brad Hooker - 1994 - Analysis 54 (2):92 - 97.
A Refutation of Consequentialism.Robert Guay - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):348-362.
Rule-Consequentialism's Dilemma.Iain Law - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):263-276.
Variable Versus Fixed-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Brad Hooker & Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):344–352.
Indirect Consequentialism, Suboptimality, and Friendship.Matthew Tedesco - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):567–577.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
163 (#76,202)

6 months
4 (#171,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brad Hooker
University of Reading

References found in this work

Variable Versus Fixed-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Brad Hooker & Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):344–352.

Add more references