Rule-consequentialism and internal consistency: A reply to card

Utilitas 19 (4):514-519 (2007)
Abstract
Rule-consequentialism has been accused of either collapsing into act-consequentialism or being internally inconsistent. I have tried to develop a form of rule-consequentialism without these flaws. In this June's issue of Utilitas, Robert Card argued that I have failed. Here I assess his arguments
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820807002786
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
104 ( #50,334 of 2,199,759 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #149,569 of 2,199,759 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature