Prometheus (forthcoming)

Jeroen Hopster
Utrecht University
The co-shaping of technology and values is a topic of increasing interest among philosophers of technology. Part of this interest pertains to anticipating future value change, or what Danaher (2021) calls the investigation of “axiological futurism”. However, this investigation faces a challenge: “axiological possibility space” is vast, and we currently lack a clear account of how this space should be demarcated. It stands to reason that speculations about how values might change over time should exclude farfetched possibilities and be restricted to possibilities that can be dubbed to be realistic instead. But what does this realism criterion entail? This paper introduces the notion of realistic possibilities as a key conceptual advancement to the study of axiological futurism and offers suggestions as to how realistic possibilities of future value change might be identified. Additionally, I propose two slight modifications to the approach of axiological futurism. First, I argue that axiological futurism can benefit from a thoroughly historicised understanding of moral change. Secondly, I argue that when employed in normative contexts, the axiological futurist should seek to identify realistic possibilities that come along with substantial normative risks.
Keywords anticipatory ethics  real possibilities  axiological futurism  value change  value sensitive design  climate ethics  risk
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Natural History of Human Morality.Michael Tomasello (ed.) - 2016 - Harvard University Press.
The Ethical Project.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Harvard University Press.
Philosophy and Climate Science.Eric Winsberg - 2018 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aerosol Geoengineering Deployment and Fairness.Toby Svoboda - 2016 - Environmental Values 25 (1):51-68.
Climate Risk Management.Klaus Keller, Casey Helgeson & Vivek Srikrishnan - 2021 - Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 49:95–116.
Climate Change Induced Risk Imposition – Challenging Sufficientarianism.Harald Stelzer - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 12:315-321.
Climate Change Justice.Darrel Moellendorf - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):173-186.
Aesthetic Value, Ethics and Climate Change.Emily Brady - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (5):551-570.
Design for Value Change.Ibo van de Poel - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (1):27-31.


Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #208,135 of 2,498,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #31,264 of 2,498,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes