In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Picturing. Oxford University Press (2010)
Some (Podro, Lopes) think that sometimes our experience of pictures is ‘inflected’. What we see in these pictures involves, somehow, an awareness of features of their design. I clarify the idea of inflection, arguing that the thought must be that what is seen in the picture is something with properties which themselves need characterising by reference to that picture’s design, conceived as such. I argue that there is at least one case of inflection, so understood. Proponents of inflection have claimed great significance for the phenomenon. But what might that significance be? Inter alia, I consider Lopes’s proposal that inflection solves a central problem in pictorial aesthetics, the ‘puzzle of mimesis’. I argue that the puzzle, and the proposed solution, both turn on aspects of Lopes’s conception of seeing-in. Other accounts of seeing-in can make no sense of either. I further argue that the phenomenon of inflection itself puts pressure on the sort of account Lopes offers. Thus it is hard to offer a view which both holds that inflection occurs and is able to make clear sense of why it matters.
|Keywords||Painting Pictorial aesthetics Seeing-in D.M.Lopes M.Podro Inflection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Trompe L’Oeil and the Dorsal/Ventral Account of Picture Perception.Bence Nanay - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (1):181-197.
Pictorial Experience: Not so Special After All.Alon Chasid - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):471-491.
Similar books and articles
Reasons for Looking: Lopes on the Value of Pictures.Robert Hopkins - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):556-569.
Inflected and Uninflected Perception of Pictures.Bence Nanay - 2010 - In C. Abell & K. Bantilaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press.
Seeing What Is Not There: Pictorial Experience, Imagination and Non-Localization.M. Pettersson - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):279-294.
The Tension Between “Combinatorial” and “Class-Default” Regularity.Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1017-1018.
How Demonstrative Pictorial Reference Grounds Contextualism.Alberto Voltolini - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):402-418.
Factive Pictorial Experience: What's Special About Photographs?Robert Hopkins - 2012 - Noûs 46 (4):709-731.
Some Problems with the Lexical Status of Nondefault Inflection.Peter Indefrey - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1025-1025.
Pitfalls in Tracking the Psychological Reality of Lexically Based and Rule-Based Inflection.Etta Drews - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1022-1023.
Added to index2011-08-01
Total downloads68 ( #78,232 of 2,178,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)44 ( #5,325 of 2,178,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?