Philosophical Studies 127 (1):19-35 (2006)

Authors
Robert Hopkins
New York University
Abstract
Two themes run through Wollheim’s work: the importance of history to the practice and appreciation of the arts, and the centrality of experience in appreciation. Prima facie, these are in tension. Reconciling them requires two steps. First, we should follow Wollheim in adopting a notion of experience on which features can be experienced even if we must have experience-independent access to the fact that the work exhibits them. Second, we need to state what makes a particular experience appropriate to the work. What does so? An obvious answer is that the experience reflects the work’s nature. Wollheim toyed with a more ambitious line, one linking the appropriate experience to our abilities to discriminate instances of the property appreciated. He allowed that having the right experience might require knowledge of the work, and thus that that experience need not be born of the ability to discriminate the property appreciated. But he seems to have held that the appropriate experience must engender that ability, at least against the background of those actual items that might be confused with instances of the property. I argue that Wollheim’s answer is less appealing than the obvious one.
Keywords Wollheim  History of art  Experience of art
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11098-005-1728-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,919
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1968 - Bobbs-Merrill.
Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Art and Its Objects.Jeffrey Wieand - 1981 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1):91-93.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Of Mi Fu's Painting and His Copying of Painting Taken as the Authentic.Shao-Long Li - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:52-58.
Depicting.Roger Squires - 1969 - Philosophy 44 (169):193 - 204.
Huzhou Zhu Pai Yu Zhongguo Ren Wen Jing Shen.Bin Fan - 2012 - Zhejiang da Xue Chu Ban She.
Painting, Sculpture, Sight, and Touch.Robert Hopkins - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166.
The Phenomenology of Painting.Nigel Wentworth - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Foucault on Painting.Catherine M. Soussloff - 2011 - History of the Human Sciences 24 (4):113-123.
Painting and Philosophy.Michael Newall - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (4):225-237.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
119 ( #77,206 of 2,343,670 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #83,355 of 2,343,670 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes