In SAGE Reference project Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Sage Publications (2014)
AbstractThis paper briefly addresses questions of confirmation and disconfirmation in psychoanalysis. It argues that psychoanalysis enjoys Bayesian support as an interpretive extension of commonsense psychology that provides the best explanation of a large range of empirical data. Suggestion provides no such explanation, and recent work in attachment, developmental psychology, and neuroscience accord with this view.
Similar books and articles
The problem of suggestion in psychoanalysis: An analysis and solution.Michael Lacewing - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (5):718-743.
Psychoanalysis Representation and Neuroscience: the Freudian unconscious and the Bayesian brain.Jim Hopkins - 2012 - In A. Fotopoulu, D. Pfaff & M. Conway (eds.), From the Couch to the Lab: Psychoanalysis, Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology in Dialoge. Oxford University Press.
Epistemology and Depth Psychology.Jim Hopkins - 1988 - In C. Wright & P. Clark (eds.), Mind, Psychoanalysis, and Science. Blackwell.
Metapsychology and the Suggestion Argument: A Reply to Grünbaum's Critique of Psychoanalysis.Ari Ollinheimo - 1999 - Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.
Causation, Association, and Confirmation.Gregory Wheeler & Richard Scheines - 2010 - In Stephan Hartmann, Marcel Weber, Wenceslao Gonzalez, Dennis Dieks & Thomas Uebe (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation: New Trends and Old Ones Reconsidered. Springer. pp. 37--51.
Wittgenstein, Interpretation, and the Foundations of Psychoanalysis.Jim Hopkins - 1995 - New Formations.
Psychoanalysis Interpretation and Science.Jim Hopkins - 1992 - In J. Hopkins & A. Savile (eds.), Psychoanalysis Mind and Art. Blackwell.
A philosophical examination of recent clinical and theoretical psychoanalysis.William Joseph Massicotte - unknown
Implicit awareness of deficit in anosognosia? An emotion-based account of denial of deficit. Comment.Oliver H. Turnbull, Karen Jones & Judith Reed-Screen - 2002 - Neuro-Psychoanalysis 4 (1):69-86.
Freud's own blend: Functional analysis, idiographic explanation, and the extension of ordinary psychology.Neil C. Manson - 2003 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2):179–195.
Old Evidence and New Explanation III.Carl G. Wagner - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (3):S165 - S175.
Contextualism, explanation and the social sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):201 – 218.
Psychoanalysis and the personal/sub‐personal distinction.Sebastian Gardner - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):96-119.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why Aren’t More Philosophers Interested in Freud? Re-Evaluating Philosophical Arguments against Psychoanalysis.Michael T. Michael - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (4):959-976.
References found in this work
No references found.