Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):556-569 (2008)
In ‘Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures’ Dominic Lopes attempts two things. First, he attempts to solve the ‘Puzzle of Mimesis’: why do we value looking at pictures over looking at the things they depict? Second, he defends ‘interactionism’: the view that some aesthetic evaluations of pictures imply evaluations in moral and cognitive terms. I argue that the attempt to solve the Puzzle turns on the notion of ‘inflection’, and that that notion is more problematic than Lopes admits. I further argue that Lopes’s defence of interactionism in fact establishes a thesis weaker than desired.
|Keywords||D.M.Lopes Painting, aesthetics of Inflection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance.Robert Hopkins - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Picturing. Oxford University Press.
Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures Edited by Lopes, Dominic Mciver.Mark Rollins - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):479–482.
How Demonstrative Pictorial Reference Grounds Contextualism.Alberto Voltolini - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):402-418.
Review: Dominic McIver Lopes: Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures. [REVIEW]Alessandro Giovannelli - 2008 - Mind 117 (466):490-494.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #82,945 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?