Sex Differences in the Association of Family and Personal Income and Wealth with Fertility in the United States

Human Nature 30 (4):477-495 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evolutionary theory predicts that social status and fertility will be positively related. It also predicts that the relationship between status and fertility will differ for men and women. This is particularly likely in modern societies given evidence that females face greater trade-offs between status and resource acquisition and fertility than males. This paper tests these hypotheses using newly released data from the 2014 wave of the Survey of Income and Program Participation by the US Census, which has the first complete measures of fertility and number of childbearing partners for a large, representative, national probability sample of men and women and also contains comprehensive measures of economic status as measured by personal and family resources, including income from all sources and all assets. Multivariate analyses show that personal income is positively associated with total fertility and number of childbearing unions for men only. For men, personal net worth is positively associated with number of childbearing unions; it is also positively associated with fertility for married men with a spouse present. These findings support evolutionary predictions of a positive relationship between status, access to mates, and reproductive success for males. Whereas personal income and personal net worth are negatively associated with total fertility and number of childbearing unions for women, family income is positively associated with total fertility for women. For married men living with a spouse, family income is negatively associated with total fertility. These findings are consistent with evolutionary theory given the existence of greater trade-offs between production and reproduction for women in an advanced industrial society. For women and men, family net worth is negatively associated with number of childbearing unions and fertility. Implications are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Optimizing Modern Family Size.David W. Lawson & Ruth Mace - 2010 - Human Nature 21 (1):39-61.
The status of women and fertility.K. B. Piepmeier & T. S. Adkins - 1973 - Journal of Biosocial Science 5 (4):507-520.
Imagining Women’s Fertility before Technology.Lisa W. Smith - 2010 - Journal of Medical Humanities 31 (1):69-79.
What teen mothers know.Arline T. Geronimus - 1996 - Human Nature 7 (4):323-352.
Porez na dohodak U republici hrvatskoj.Miljenko Javorovic - 2015 - Fip: Journal of Finance and Law 3 (1):83-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-05

Downloads
6 (#1,377,938)

6 months
3 (#857,336)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?