The meta-ethical significance of experiments about folk moral objectivism

Philosophical Psychology 32 (6):831-852 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The meta-ethical commitments of folk respondents – specifically their commitment to the objectivity of moral claims – have recently become subject to empirical scrutiny. Experimental findings suggest that people are meta-ethical pluralists: There is both inter- and intrapersonal variation with regard to people’s objectivist commitments. What meta-ethical implications, if any, do these findings have? I point out that current research does not directly address traditional meta-ethical questions: The methods used and distinctions drawn by experimenters do not perfectly match those of meta-ethicists. However, I go on to argue that, in spite of this mismatch, the research findings should be of interest to moral philosophers, including meta-ethicists. Not only do these findings extend the field of moral psychology with new data and hypotheses, but they also provide tentative evidence that touches on the adequacy of theses in moral semantics and moral metaphysics. Specifically, they put pressure on argum...

Similar books and articles

How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments.James R. Beebe - 2014 - In Jennifer Cole Wright & Hagop Sarkissian (eds.), Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 167-187.
From punishment to universalism.David Rose & Shaun Nichols - 2018 - Mind and Language 34 (1):59-72.
Moral objectivism across the lifespan.James R. Beebe & David Sackris - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):912-929.
Aspects of folk morality: Objectivism and relativism.Hagop Sarkissian - 2016 - In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. London, UK: pp. 212-224.
Ronald Dworkin and the External Sceptic.Dale Smith - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2):433-457.
Folk experiments.Jeffery W. Bentley - 2006 - Agriculture and Human Values 23 (4):451-462.
The Moral Judgment. [REVIEW]S. C. N. - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (3):485-486.
Moral objectivism and a punishing God.Hagop Sarkissian & Mark Phelan - 2019 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 80:1-7.
Facts About Natural Values.Robert Elliot - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (3):221 - 234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-22

Downloads
544 (#33,941)

6 months
203 (#13,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeroen Hopster
Utrecht University

References found in this work

The rise and fall of experimental philosophy.Antti Kauppinen - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):95 – 118.
The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention.S. J. Eggleston & Elliot Turiel - 1985 - British Journal of Educational Studies 33 (2):186.
Moral objectivism across the lifespan.James R. Beebe & David Sackris - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):912-929.

View all 31 references / Add more references