Authors
John Horty
University of Maryland, College Park
Abstract
This paper points out some problems with two recent logical systems – one due to Prakken and Sartor, the other due to Kowalski and Toni – designedfor the representation of defeasible arguments in general, but with a specialemphasis on legal reasoning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1023/A:1011288805074
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,044
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):25-75.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Defaults with Priorities.John Horty - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (4):367-413.
Moral Particularism in the Light of Deontic Logic.Xavier Parent - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):75-98.
Remedial Interchange, Contrary-to-Duty Obligation and Commutation.Xavier Parent - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (3-4):345-375.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
73 ( #141,892 of 2,433,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,411 of 2,433,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes