Climate change mitigation, sustainability and non-substitutability

In Adrian Walsh, Säde Hormio & Duncan Purves (eds.), The Ethical Underpinnings of Climate Economics. London, UK: pp. 103-121 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Climate change policy decisions are inescapably intertwined with future generations. Even if all carbon dioxide emissions were to be stopped today, most aspects of climate change would persist for hundreds of years, thus inevitably raising questions of intergenerational justice and sustainability. The chapter begins with a short overview of discount rate debate in climate economics, followed by the observation that discounting implicitly makes the assumption that natural capital is always substitutable with man-made capital. The chapter explains why non-substitutability matters if we are to take intergenerational justice seriously and invest aptly in mitigation. Non-substitutability simply implies that there are some forms of capital that cannot be substituted by another, and so consumption of one cannot be compensated with additional stocks of the other. The non-substitutability of critical natural capital can be defended without empirical data about preferences or the need to view the environment as a superior good, and the argument is presented through the language of keeping options open. Those alive today make decisions about what natural capital to use and what to save for future. These choices are often represented as different points in a continuum of sustainability: weak sustainability is associated with a high degree of substitutability and therefore a lot of flexibility over what capital to consume, whereas strong sustainability is more stringent on substitutability. While it may be that in economical understanding weak and strong sustainability collapse into one another, philosophically the emphasis is slightly different. The chapter discusses how normative sustainability can be supported without ignoring opportunity costs and trade-offs.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Truths Don’t Matter: The Case of Strong Sustainability.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2019 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 22 (2):184-196.
Sustainability for a Warming Planet. [REVIEW]David M. Frank - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):400-404.
Workshop: Hot Topic.Helen Takacs, Jerry Calton & Nancy Kurland - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:544-554.
Adaptation, Transformation, and Development.Allen Thompson - 2020 - Environmental Ethics 42 (1):5-20.
Ethics in the Anthropocene: Moral Responses to the Climate Crisis.Benjamin S. Lowe - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (3):479-485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-12

Downloads
360 (#56,244)

6 months
139 (#25,654)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Säde Hormio
University of Helsinki

References found in this work

Discounting the Future.John Broome - 1994 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (2):128-156.
Can we harm and benefit in creating?Elizabeth Harman - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):89–113.
Theoretical foundations of liberalism.Jeremy Waldron - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (147):127-150.

View all 21 references / Add more references