Abstract
Lepore and Stone seek to replace the rationality-based Gricean picture of coordination between speaker and hearer with one leaning more strongly on the roles of convention and speaker knowledge while doing away with conversational implicature. Focusing on the phenomena of indirect speech acts, asymmetric conjunction, and scalar inferencing, I argue that the case for abandoning implicature as an analytical tool is not ultimately compelling. I seek further to demonstrate the utility of the classical Gricean distinction between what is said and what is implicated in the construction of an intuitively appealing approach to the perennial question of how to distinguish lying from misleading inside and outside the legal domain.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2015.1125133
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Studies in the Way of Words.H. P. Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Thought and Reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - Oxford University Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Imagination and Convention. Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. [REVIEW]Ricardo Mena - 2017 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (146):133-151.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-16

Total views
25 ( #434,946 of 2,446,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #310,336 of 2,446,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes