Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):145-162 (2016)
AbstractLepore and Stone seek to replace the rationality-based Gricean picture of coordination between speaker and hearer with one leaning more strongly on the roles of convention and speaker knowledge while doing away with conversational implicature. Focusing on the phenomena of indirect speech acts, asymmetric conjunction, and scalar inferencing, I argue that the case for abandoning implicature as an analytical tool is not ultimately compelling. I seek further to demonstrate the utility of the classical Gricean distinction between what is said and what is implicated in the construction of an intuitively appealing approach to the perennial question of how to distinguish lying from misleading inside and outside the legal domain.
Similar books and articles
In Defense of Indirect Communication.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):163-174.
Situated inference versus conversational implicature.Christopher Gauker - 2001 - Noûs 35 (2):163–189.
Implicating.Claudia Bianchi - 2013 - In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, Handbooks of Pragmatics (HoPs) Vol. 2.
Rationality and Conversation: A Thesis on Grice’s Theory of Conversation.Matthew D. Schoolfield - unknown
Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory.Wayne A. Davis - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On Imagination and Convention. Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. [REVIEW]Ricardo Mena - 2017 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (146):133-151.
References found in this work
Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication.Robyn Carston - 2002 - Oxford: Blackwell.
Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature.Stephen C. Levinson - 2000 - MIT Press.
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish - 1979 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.