Stanford University Press (2002)
AbstractDialectic of Enlightenment is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
Similar books and articles
Counter-enlightenments: From the Eighteenth Century to the Present.Graeme Garrard - 2004 - Routledge.
Hegel and the dialectic of enlightenment : the recognition of education in civil society.Nigel Tubbs - unknown
Ulysses' reason, nobody's fault: Reason, subjectivity and the critique of enlightenment.Marianna Papastephanou - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):47-59.
Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment.Alfredo Lucero-Montano - 2006 - Philosophy Pathways 114.
Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments.Theodor W. Adorno - 1944 - Stanford University Press.
Enlightenment of Rationality: Remarks on Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment.Hauke Brunkhorst - 2000 - Constellations 7 (1):133-140.
Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School.John Abromeit - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Myth and Myth Criticism following the Dialectic of Enlightenment.Avner Cohen - 2010 - The European Legacy 15 (5):583-598.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Black-box artificial intelligence: an epistemological and critical analysis.Manuel Carabantes - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (2):309-317.
‘After Auschwitz’: Writing history after injustice in Adorno and Lyotard.Javier Burdman - 2021 - Contemporary Political Theory 20 (4):815-835.
African Communitarianism and Difference.Thaddeus Metz - 2020 - In Elvis Imafidon (ed.), Handbook of the African Philosophy of Difference. Springer. pp. 31-51.
References found in this work
No references found.