Feminist economics: an Austrian perspective

Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):259-280 (1995)
Abstract
This paper attempts to assess the recent literature on feminist economics from the perspective of modern Austrian economics. Feminists and Austrians share many epistemological and methodological criticisms of neoclassical theory, although Austrians have never linked those criticisms to gender. Both groups argue that the attempt to mimic the methods of the natural sciences has been a particular source of trouble for neoclassicism. The paper suggests that these common points of criticism can serve as a starting point for dialogue between the two groups. Despite their similar criticisms, the groups do have divergent views on what economic theory should look like, as well as the policy conclusions that likely flow from those theories. The paper explores two examples of theoretical differences (the concept of utility and the relationship between competition and cooperation) and suggests ways that feminists and Austrians might begin to sort out their differences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13501789500000018
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Personal Knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Death of Nature.Carolyn Merchant - forthcoming - Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Why the Acrimony? Reply to Davidson.Stephan Boehm & Karl Farmer - 1993 - Critical Review 7 (2-3):407-421.
Individuals and Institutions.Peter J. Boettke - 1990 - Critical Review 4 (1-2):10-26.
On the Austrianness of Austrian Economics.Barry Smith - 1990 - Critical Review 4 (1-2):212-238.
Added to PP index
2012-02-20

Total downloads
100 ( #55,474 of 2,210,506 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #127,844 of 2,210,506 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature