Synthese 198 (11):10237-10271 (2020)

John Horden
Universitat de Barcelona
We say that each social group is identical to its members. The group just is them; they just are the group. This view of groups as pluralities has tended to be swiftly rejected by social metaphysicians, if considered at all, mainly on the basis of two objections. First, it is argued that groups can change in membership, while pluralities cannot. Second, it is argued that different groups can have exactly the same members, while different pluralities cannot. We rebut these objections, and argue that our plural view is superior to alternative reductive proposals which would identify social groups with the sets or fusions of their members. Finally we deal with some further potential challenges for the view of groups as pluralities. Thus we aim to establish it as a serious contender in the metaphysics of groups.
Keywords social ontology  social groups  reductionism  identity  social roles  plural terms  flexible terms  metalinguistic negation  higher-level plural logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-020-02715-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Plural Quantification.Ø Linnebo - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Are Groups?Katherine Ritchie - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):257-272.
On the Logic of Classes as Many.Nino B. Cocchiarella - 2002 - Studia Logica 70 (3):303-338.
Social Action In Large Groups.Ulrich Baltzer - 2003 - ProtoSociology 18:127-136.
When Do Some Things Form a Set?Simon Hewitt - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (3):311-337.
Group Membership and Parthood.David Strohmaier - 2018 - Journal of Social Ontology 4 (2):121-135.
Social Groups and Special Obligations.Kenneth Eric Shockley - 2002 - Dissertation, Washington University
Social Structures and the Ontology of Social Groups.Katherine Ritchie - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2):402-424.
How Individuals Constitute Group Agents.Keith Harris - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):350-364.
How Groups Persist.August Faller - 2019 - Synthese 198 (8):1-15.
Social Mereology.Jane Hawley Katherine - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association.
Social Creationism and Social Groups.Katherine Ritchie - 2018 - In Kendy Hess, Violetta Igneski & Tracy Isaacs (eds.), Collectivity: Ontology, Ethics, and Social Justice. London, UK: pp. 13-34.
The Mark of the Plural: Generic Generalizations and Race.Daniel Wodak & Sarah-Jane Leslie - 2017 - In Paul C. Taylor, Linda Martín Alcoff & Luvell Anderson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Race. Routledge. pp. 277-289.


Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #144,718 of 2,504,831 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #36,173 of 2,504,831 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes