Group Oughts

In John Horty (ed.), Agency and deontic logic. New York: Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of what an agent ought to do is generalized to yield a notion of what groups of agents ought to do. Relations among the obligations governing groups and subgroups are explored, as well as the connections among different species of individual act utilitarianism, group act utilitarianism, and rule utilitarianism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,272

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conditional Oughts.John F. Horty - 2001 - In John Horty (ed.), Agency and deontic logic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ought to Do.John F. Horty - 2001 - In John Horty (ed.), Agency and deontic logic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Strategic Oughts.John F. Horty - 2001 - In John Horty (ed.), Agency and deontic logic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ought to Be.John F. Horty - 2001 - In John Horty (ed.), Agency and deontic logic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moral conflicts between groups of agents.Barteld Kooi & Allard Tamminga - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (1):1-21.
Agency and deontic logic.John Horty - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A dilemma for objective act-utilitarianism.Gerald Lang - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
5 (#1,767,543)

6 months
5 (#1,292,091)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Horty
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references