Thinking and Reasoning 24 (1):117-128 (2018)

Abstract
ABSTRACTIn everyday situations, people regularly receive information from large groups of people and from single experts. Although lay opinions and expert opinions have been studied extensively in isolation, the present study examined the relationship between the two by asking how many laypeople are needed to counter an expert opinion. A Bayesian formalisation allowed the prescription of this quantity. Participants were subsequently asked to assess how many laypeople are needed in different situations. The results demonstrate that people are sensitive to the relevant factors identified for determining how many lay opinions are required to counteract a single expert opinion. People's assessments were fairly good in line with Bayesian predictions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1080/13546783.2017.1378721
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,339
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation.Ulrike Hahn - 2020 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24 (5):363-374.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mizrahi and Seidel: Experts in Confusion.Martin David Hinton - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (4):539-554.
On a Razor's Edge: Evaluating Arguments From Expert Opinion.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):139-159.
Expertise and Public Ignorance.Evan M. Selinger - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):375-386.
Risk Assessment and Uncertainty.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:504 - 517.
Putting Experts in Their Place.Paul J. Quirk - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):333-357.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-09-23

Total views
48 ( #222,378 of 2,448,787 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #444,630 of 2,448,787 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes