Immortality, human nature, the value of life and the value of life extension

Bioethics 20 (6):279–292 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The emerging discourse concerning the desirability of intervention in senescence to achieve radical life extension for persons has featured some striking blurring in traditional liberal and conservative commitments and positions. This affords an opportunity for re‐evaluation of these same. The canonical conservative view of the intrinsic value of life is re‐examined and found primarily to involve a denial of human prerogative, rather than an active underwriting of the value of life extension. A critique is offered of an attempted argument against aging intervention from a proto‐conservative worry about a purported threat to human nature. Immortality is found to be a red herring, but a revealing one. Further, the classic liberal view is examined and found wanting in terms of the gravity of its own commitment to, and fullness of its account of the value of life, and the value of life extension. An analysis of the liberal conception of personhood is proposed that both defines persons necessarily as processes, and demonstrates the inalienable quality of the value of life extension to persons so defined.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
231 (#79,282)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Life's Dominion.Melissa Lane & Ronald Dworkin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):413.
Religion and the Secularization of Bioethics.Daniel Callahan - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (4):2-4.
What's wrong with enhancement.Michael Sandel - 2002 - President’s Council on Bioethics, Washington, Dc (Www. Bioethics. Gov) 12.

View all 8 references / Add more references