It's Not So Simple: A More Complex Behavioral and Psychological Perspective on Genetic Enhancement (and Diminishment)

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):76-78 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ruiping Fan (2010), employing a Confucian values framework, appropriately critiques Michael Sandel's (2007) absolutist rejection of genetic enhancement. As described by Fan, Sandel believes genetic...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161003633052

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can human genetic enhancement be prohibited?William Gardner - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):65-84.
Genetic enhancement: Plan now to act later.Maxwell J. Mehlman - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):77-82.
Reshaping Human Intelligence: The Debate about Genetic Enhancement of Cognitive Functions.Michael Fuchs - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):165-181.
A Behavioral Science of Mental Life: Comments on Foxall's "Intentional Behaviorism".Howard Rachlin - 2007 - Behavior and Philosophy 35:131 - 138.
pt. VI. Genetics and enhancement. Population genetic research and screening: conceptual and ethical issues / Eric Juengst ; Enhancement / Thomas Murray ; Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings / Julian Savulescu ; Pharmacogenomics: ethical and regulatory issues. [REVIEW]Matthew DeCamp & Allen Buchanan - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Genetic Enhancement and Moral Attitudes Toward the Given.Terrance Mcconnell - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):369-380.
Integrating genetic, behavioral, and psychometric research in conceptualizing human behavioral traits.Marcus R. Munafò - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):358-359.
Gene Doping and the Responsibility of Bioethicists.Ashkan Atry, Mats G. Hansson & Ulrik Kihlbom - 2011 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (2):149 - 160.
Genetic Enhancement, Human Nature, and Rights.T. Mcconnell - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (4):415-428.
The wisdom of caution: Genetic enhancement and future children.Jason Borenstein - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):517-530.
Moral enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
Attentional deficit versus impaired reality testing: What is the role of executive dysfunction in complex visual hallucinations?Ralf-Peter Behrendt - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):758-759.
Germ-line genetic enhancement and Rawlsian primary goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):39-56.
In Sport and Social Justice, Is Genetic Enhancement a Game Changer?Lisa S. Parker - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (4):328-346.
Social Perspectives and Genetic Enhancement: Whose Perspective? Whose Choice?Sarah E. Wilson - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action.David Morris, E. Thelen & L. B. Smith - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2).
A confucian reflection on genetic enhancement.Ruiping Fan - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):62 – 70.

Add more references