Leibniz’s Contemporary Modal Theodicy

Quaestiones Disputatae 7 (2):97-119 (2017)
Authors
Charles Joshua Horn
University of Wisconsin, Steven's Point
Abstract
In this essay, it is argued that Leibniz’s theodicy is even stronger than it might first appear, but only if we also take into account his super-essentialism, the view that every property of a substance is essential to it, and theory of compossibility, the notion that possible worlds are intrinsically possible just in case they are compossible—that is, they are internally consistent. After describing how we should understand these principles in Leibniz’s thought, I argue that although there are obvious cases of evil in the best of all possible worlds, if such cases of evil did not occur, then the overall goodness of the actual world be diminished. Due to the unique nature of his solution to the problem of evil, Leibniz remains an important interlocutor even today in metaphysics, theology, and philosophy of religion.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2150-5756
DOI 10.5840/qd2017726
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,386
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz's Doctrine of Evil.Michael John Latzer - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Malebranche's Theodicy.Andrew G. Black - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (1):27-44.
Leibniz and Lewis on Modal Metaphysics and Fatalism.Chloe Armstrong - 2017 - Quaestiones Disputatae 7 (2):72-96.
Contingency, Imperfection and Evil.Saša Stanković - 2017 - Quaestiones Disputatae 7 (2):50-71.
Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes?Brett Gaul - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
Leibniz, Acosmism, and Incompossibility.Thomas Feeney - 2016 - In Gregory Brown & Yual Chiek (eds.), Leibniz on Compossibility and Possible Worlds. Springer. pp. 145-174.
The Anxious Believer: Macaulay's Prescient Theodicy.Jill Graper Hernandez - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):175-187.
The Ethics of Leibniz' "Theodicy".Mark Joseph Larrimore - 1994 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Leibniz’s Metaphysical Evil Revisited.Maria Rosa Antognazza - 2014 - In Samuel Newlands Larry Jorgensen (ed.), New Essays on Leibniz’s Theodicy. Oxford University Press. pp. 112-134.
Malebranche and Leibniz on the Best of All Possible Worlds.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Leibniz on Essence, Existence and Creation.Stephen A. Erickson - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):476 - 487.
Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes?Brett Gaul - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-19

Total downloads
9 ( #538,161 of 2,267,040 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #106,025 of 2,267,040 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature