The analysis of humour
INTRODUCTION Theories of humour are traditionally divided into two classes: superiority or relief theories, and incongruity or ambiguity theories. As their names imply, the former tend to ascribe amusement primarily to a particular attitude of mind, while the latter account for it by describing its objects as having a particular quality. Enjoyment as an attitude is always a response to an object present to the mind or feelings. If, then, enjoyment in amusement is identical with feelings of superiority or relief, its objects must always display characteristics of inferiority or inhibition. But the enjoyment of humour seems to be distinguishable from a reaction to particular kinds of topic, and from any personal relation felt between the subject and the objects of his amusement. Incongruity theories do not explicitly ascribe the enjoyment of humour to a particular range of topics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Must the Tolerant Person Have a Sense of Humour? On the Structure of Tolerance as a Virtue.David Owen - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):385-403.
Humour and Aesthetic Enjoyment of Incongruities.Mike W. Martin - 1983 - British Journal of Aesthetics 23 (1):74-85.
Entre satire et humour, Shaftesbury et le thé'tre élisabéthain.Françoise Badelon - 1999 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2:161-172.
Added to index2010-07-21
Total downloads14 ( #331,088 of 2,163,685 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,685 )
How can I increase my downloads?