Medical Humanities 46 (4):362-371 (2020)

Abstract
This enquiry examines problems which haunt the ‘heart’ and its donation. It begins by examining the heart’s enduring significance for culturally mediated self-understanding, its vulnerability to misunderstanding and abuse and its relevance to challenging the determination of death by neurological criteria. Despite turns to brain-centred self-conceptions, the heart remains haunted by the hybrid experiences of identity accompanying organ transplant, the relational significance attached to dead hearts witnessed in the Alder Hey scandal and claims that heart transplants commonly constitute the legitimate killing of a person. To explore these phenomena, traditions are retrieved in which the heart-as-organ was construed in terms of a person’s core identity. Influential Abrahamic beliefs about ‘the heart’ are considered in order to explore explanations for why the heart remains culturally pre-eminent, to make intelligible our haunted hearts and to examine possible violations of solidarity in organ donation practice. Jewish and Christian Scriptures are exegeted to illumine the sources of our haunting and address the desire for holistic bodily life. In these sources, the heart is the seat of affections, intelligence and agency but requires healing, conceived via the surgical metaphors of heart transplant and circumcision, if people are to join the insightful, solidary path of pilgrimage. Absent healing, the heart experiences a judgement of the whole person—organ-and-core—at the moment of death. Through such exegesis, the doctrine of the Holy Ghost emerges as a way to make intelligible, though not dispel, the heart’s haunting. The doctrine’s practical significance concerns the possibility of social unity among hearts, ‘intercordiality’, which construes people within a covenantal life of pilgrimage which encourages heart donation in certain circumstances, makes intelligible the Alder Hey parents’ experience of social misunderstanding and rejects ascribing any legitimacy in medical culture to the consensual killing of patients for the sake of retrieving their organs.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medhum-2020-011870
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Future of Human Nature.Jurgen Habermas - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):483-486.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Truthfulness in Transplantation: Non-Heart-Beating Organ Donation.Michael Potts - 2007 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2:17-.
Potentiality, Irreversibility, and Death.John P. Lizza - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):45 – 64.
The Institute of Medicine on Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation.Alister Browne - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):75-86.
Cadaveric Tissue Donation: A Pathologist's Perspective.P. J. van Diest - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):135-136.
Death in Denmark.M. Evans - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):191-194.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-04

Total views
3 ( #1,356,970 of 2,504,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes