In Arindam Chakrabarti & Ralph Weber (eds.), Comparative Philosophy without Borders. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 69-82 (2016)

Authors
Chien-hsing Ho
Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Abstract
A number of contemporary philosophers think that the unqualified statement “X is unspeakable” faces the danger of self-referential absurdity: if this statement is true, it must simultaneously be false, given that X is speakable by the predicate word “unspeakable.” This predicament is in this chapter formulated as an argument that I term the “ineffability paradox.” After examining the Buddhist semantic theory of apoha (exclusion) and an apoha solution to the issue, I resort to a few Chinese Buddhist and Hindu philosophical materials to rationally reconstruct a strategy for resolving the paradox. By introducing the mode of expression termed “indication,” together with the relevant notions of superimposition and of gesturing beyond the horizon, I show that expressing the ineffable does not necessarily involve irresoluble contradiction. It is also suggested that philosophers may need to acknowledge the relevance of the notion of ineffability for contemporary philosophizing.
Keywords Indication  Apoha (exclusion)  Ineffability Paradox  Gestural Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Beyond the Limits of Thought.Graham Priest - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (194):121-125.
Does God Have a Nature.Alvin Plantinga - 1980 - Marquette University Press.
Beyond the Limits of Thought.Graham Priest - 1995 - Philosophy 71 (276):308-310.
Does God Have a Nature?William L. Rowe - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):305.
Saying the Unsayable.Chien-Hsing Ho - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (3):409-427.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Saying the Unsayable.Chien-Hsing Ho - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (3):409-427.
Aesthetic Ineffability.Rafael De Clercq - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (8-9):87-97.
Curry, Yablo and Duality.Roy T. Cook - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):612-620.
Bocheński on Divine Ineffability.Roger Pouivet - 2013 - Studies in East European Thought 65 (1-2):43-51.
Languaje, Paradox and Ineffability.Charles Holmes - 1994 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 29 (64):159-186.
Ineffability Claims in the Mystical Theology of St John of the Cross.Jill Leblanc - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Ineffability.John Hick - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (1):35-46.
Cortical Feedback and the Ineffability of Colors.Mark F. Sharlow - 2005 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 11.
The No-No Paradox Is a Paradox.Roy T. Cook - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):467-482.
Divine Ineffability.Guy Bennett‐Hunter - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (7):489-500.
The Liar: What Paradox? [REVIEW]Avrum Stroll - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (1):63-75.
Grelling’s Paradox.Jay Newhard - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):1 - 27.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-06-21

Total views
178 ( #47,625 of 2,324,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #20,323 of 2,324,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes