Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197):452-470 (1999)

Authors
Keith Horton
University of Wollongong
Abstract
It has become increasingly common recently to construe human natureas setting some pretty stringent limits to moral endeavour. Many consequentialists, in particular, take considerations concerning human nature to defeat certain demanding norms that would otherwise follow from their theory. One argument is that certain commitments ground psychological incapacitiesthat prevent us from doing what would maximize the good. Another is that we would be likely to suffer some kind of psychological demoralization if we tried to become significantly more selfless. I argue that influential versions of both of these arguments underestimate our deliberative resources, and also fail to examine the kind of moral sources that may be able to sustain rigorous moral endeavour. Pessimism about our capacities for such endeavour results from the neglect of these factors, rather than from uncovering any significant limitations in human nature.
Keywords demandingness  human nature  consequentialism  moral sources
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00153
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue.Roger Crisp - 1992 - Philosophical Quarterly 42 (167):139-160.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
348 ( #19,344 of 2,330,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #44,699 of 2,330,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes