Legal Theory 10 (1):19-31 (2004)

John Horty
University of Maryland, College Park
The result model of precedent holds that a legal precedent controls a fortiori cases—those cases, that is, that are at least as strong for the winning side of the precedent as the precedent case itself. This paper defends the result model against some objections by Larry Alexander, drawing on ideas from the field of Artificial Intelligence and Law in order to define an appropriate strength ordering for cases
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1352325204000151
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,599
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Features of Similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudes.John Horty - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (3):309-345.
HYPO's Legacy: Introduction to the Virtual Special Issue.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):205-250.
A Factor-Based Definition of Precedential Constraint.John F. Horty & Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (2):181-214.
An Improved Factor Based Approach to Precedential Constraint.Adam Rigoni - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (2):133-160.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
586 ( #12,754 of 2,462,130 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,335 of 2,462,130 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes