Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):243-266 (2010)
In spite of the considerable literature nowadays existing on the issue of the moral exclusion of nonhuman animals, there is still work to be done concerning the characterization of the conceptual framework with which this question can be appraised. This paper intends to tackle this task. It starts by defining speciesism as the unjustified disadvantageous consideration or treatment of those who are not classified as belonging to a certain species. It then clarifies some common misunderstandings concerning what this means. Next, it rejects the idea that there are different kinds of speciesism. Such an idea may result from confusion because there are (1) different ways in which speciesism can be defended; and (2) different speciesist positions, that is, different positions that assume speciesism among their premises. Depending on whether or not these views assume other criteria for moral consideration apart from speciesism, they can be combined or simple speciesist positions. But speciesism remains in all cases the same idea. Finally, the paper examines the concept of anthropocentrism, the disadvantageous treatment or consideration of those who are not members of the human species. This notion must be conceptually distinguished from speciesism and from misothery (aversion to nonhuman animals). Anthropocentrism is shown to be refuted because it either commits a petitio principia fallacy or it falls prey to two arguments: the argument from species overlap (widely but misleadingly known as “argument from marginal cases”) and the argument from relevance. This rebuttal identifies anthropocentrism as a speciesist view.
|Keywords||Anthropocentrism Argument from Relevance Argument from Species Overlap Discrimination Misothery Speciesism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Ferré: Organicistic Connectedness—But Still Speciesistic.Arthur Zucker - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):185 - 190.
Bonnie Steinbock Comments and on and Criticisms of Peter Singer's "Speciesism" Argument.Bob Corbett - unknown
Anthropocentrism.Julia Tanner - 2012 - In Craig W. Allin (ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues.
Buddhism and Speciesism: On the Misapplication of Western Concepts to Buddhist Beliefs.Colette Sciberras - 2008 - Journal of Buddhist Ethics 15:215-240.
Animal Welfare and Individual Characteristics: A Conversation Against Speciesism.Marc Bekoff & Lofe Gruen - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (2):163 – 175.
The Relevance of Speciesism to Life Sciences Practices.Roger Wertheimer - 2007 - In Fred Adams (ed.), Journal of Philosophical Research. Philosophy Document Center. pp. 27-38.
Added to index2009-08-22
Total downloads192 ( #21,790 of 2,153,589 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #67,202 of 2,153,589 )
How can I increase my downloads?