- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Epistemology is more than method: A reply to Yanchar and Kristensen
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):103-110 (1996)
Abstract
Responds to S. C. Yanchar and K. B. Kristensen's comments on L. T. Hoshmand and J. Martin's proposal for a naturalistic epistemological approach. Further clarification of the proposal is provided and implications for the development of a theory of method and issues of communal evaluation and intelligibility are discussed. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)DOI
10.1037/h0091154
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Notes on a naturalized epistemology.Stephen C. Yanchar & Kristoffer B. Kristensen - 1996 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):93-102.
On starting points and priorities: A rejoinder.Stephen C. Yanchar & Kristoffer B. Kristensen - 1996 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):111-122.
On What Basis are Evaluations Possible in a Fragmented Psychology? An Alternative to Objectivism and Relativism.Kristoffer Kristensen, Brent D. Slife & Stephen C. Yanchar - 2000 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (3):273-288.
Naturalizing the epistemology of psychological research.Lisa Tsoi Hoshmand & Jack Martin - 1994 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 14 (2):171-189.
Veritistic Epistemology and the Epistemic Goals of Groups: A Reply to Vähämaa.Don Fallis & Kay Mathiesen - 2013 - Social Epistemology 27 (1):21 - 25.
A Group Epistemology is a Group Necessity: A Reply to Fallis and Mathiesen.Miika Vähämaa - 2013 - Social Epistemology 27 (1):26 - 31.
Sellars' behaviourism: A reply to Fred Wilson.Ausonio Marras - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (December):413-418.
Review of Behavior and personality: Psychological behaviorism. [REVIEW]Stephen C. Yanchar - 1998 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):61-69.
Fragmentation in focus: History, integration, and the project of evaluation.Stephen C. Yanchar - 1997 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):150-170.
Irreducible ethics: A defense of strenuousness and responsibility.Edwin E. Gantt & Stephen C. Yanchar - 2007 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):35-52.
Review of Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. [REVIEW]Stephen C. Yanchar - 1997 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):171-176.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-14
Downloads
16 (#676,405)
6 months
1 (#483,081)
2010-09-14
Downloads
16 (#676,405)
6 months
1 (#483,081)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5c86f9596c-qsn25 N