Zygon 55 (4):1011-1040 (2020)

Authors
Ali Hossein Khani
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
Abstract
What does it take for Islam and science to engage in a genuine conversation with each other? This essay is an attempt to answer this question by clarifying the conditions which make having such a conversation possible and plausible. I will first distinguish between three notions of conversation: the trivial conversation (which requires sharing a common language and the meaning of its ordinary expressions), superficial conversation (in which although the language is shared, the communicators fail to share the meaning of their theoretical terms), and genuine conversation (which implies sharing the language and the meaning of ordinary as well as theoretical terms). I will then argue that our real concern with regard to the exchange between Islam and science is to be to specify the conditions under which their proponents can engage in a genuine conversation with each other and that such a conversation to take place essentially requires sharing a common ontology. Following Quine, I will argue that Muslims, like the followers of any religion, would have no other choice but to work from within science. Doing so, however, would not prevent Muslims from having a genuine conversation with the proponents of other worldviews because when the shared ontology fails to offer any potentially testable answer to our remaining questions about the world, the Islamic viewpoint can appear as a genuine alternative among other underdetermined ones, deciding between which would be a matter of pragmatic criteria.
Keywords Donald Davidson  Islam and science  naturalism  Willard Van Orman Quine  underdetermination  Hilary Putnam  Philosophy of Language  Meaning  Ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1111/zygo.12646
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

View all 90 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democracy and Islam.Irfan Ahmad - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (4):459-470.
Doing Science.Fred Grinnell - 2002 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 15 (1-2):204-210.
What 'Biological Racial Realism' Should Mean.Quayshawn Spencer - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):181-204.
The Identity of Islamic Philosophy.Saeed Rahimian - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 26.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-04

Total views
73 ( #150,804 of 2,462,150 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #47,931 of 2,462,150 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes