Abstract
Investigations of large scale industrial accidents generally take one of two alternative approaches to identifying the cause or causes of those destructive events. The first is legal analysis, which focuses on the mechanical failure or human error that immediately preceded the accident. The second is socio-technical reasoning, which centers on the complexities of the interlocking technological and organizational systems that brought about the accident. Both are retrospective, and provide little insight into the means of avoiding industrial accidents in the future. This article looks at six levels of managerial responsibility within a firm, and suggests specific changes at all levels that should logically help in the prevention or mitigation of these high impactllow probability events. The most basicneed, however, is for imagination, empathy, and courage at the most senior level of the firm
Keywords Business and Professional Ethics  Conference Proceedings
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1949-0232
DOI 10.5840/ruffinx1998112
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Risk Management, Real Options, Corporate Social Responsibility.Bryan W. Husted - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2):175-183.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
41 ( #255,649 of 60,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #72,200 of 60,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes