Dialectica 72 (1):101-120 (2018)

Authors
Ali Hossein Khani
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
Abstract
Davidson has always been explicit in his faithful adherence to the main doctrines of Quine’s philosophy of language, among which the indeterminacy of translation thesis is significant. For Quine, the indeterminacy of translation has considerable ontological consequences, construed as leading to a sceptical conclusion regarding the existence of fine-grained meaning facts. Davidson’s suggested reading of Quine’s indeterminacy arguments seems to be intended to block any such sceptical consequences. According to this reading, Quine’s arguments at most yield the conclusion that there are always different ways of representing the facts about meaning, rather than the sceptical conclusion that there are no such facts. It is, however, puzzling how Davidson can endorse the main premises of Quine’s arguments, i.e. his general physicalistic view and his thesis of the indeterminacy of translation, and yet resist the arguments’ sceptical outcome. I will argue that Davidson’s construal of Quine’s thesis of the indeterminacy of translation is unjustified and faces a problematic dilemma.
Keywords Indeterminacy of Translation  Donald Davidson  W. V. O. Quine  Physicalism  Anomalous Monism  Underdetermination  Inscrutability of Reference  Weak vs. Strong Underdetermination  Radical Interpretation  Triangulation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1746-8361.12217
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Knowing One’s Own Mind.Donald Davidson - 1987 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60 (3):441-458.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.
Radical Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Dialectica 27 (1):314-328.

View all 49 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Davidson’s Wittgenstein.Ali Hossein Khani - 2020 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8 (5):1-26.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Must We Know What We Mean?Kuang-Ming Cheng - 2005 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):21-33.
Quine's Dilemma.Roger F. Gibson - 1986 - Synthese 69 (1):27 - 39.
On How to Avoid the Indeterminacy of Translation.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):395-413.
Incommensurability and the Indeterminacy of Translation.Howard Sankey - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):219 – 223.
Kripkenstein: Rule and Indeterminacy.Xin Sheen Liu - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 32:67-75.
Ontological Relativity in Quine and Davidson.J. Malpas - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):157-178.
Indeterminacy of Translation.Alan Weir - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Ontological Relativity in Quine and Davidson.J. Malpas - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):157-178.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-31

Total views
35 ( #314,868 of 2,462,160 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #144,304 of 2,462,160 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes