Synthese 198 (Suppl 16):3727-3745 (2019)

Abstract
We critically analyze the rationale of arguments from finetuning and naturalness in particle physics and cosmology, notably the small values of the mass of the Higgs-boson and the cosmological constant. We identify several new reasons why these arguments are not scientifically relevant. Besides laying out why the necessity to define a probability distribution renders arguments from naturalness internally contradictory, it is also explained why it is conceptually questionable to single out assumptions about dimensionless parameters from among a host of other assumptions. Some other numerological coincidences and their problems are also discussed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02377-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,248
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naturalness, the Autonomy of Scales, and the 125GeV Higgs.Porter Williams - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51:82-96.
Two Notions of Naturalness.Porter Williams - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (9):1022-1050.
Cosmology and Convention.David Merritt - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 57:41-52.
Which Fine-Tuning Arguments Are Fine?Alexei Grinbaum - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (5):615-631.
Challenges to Bayesian Confirmation Theory.J. D. Norton - 2011 - In Philosophy of Statistics: Volume 7 in Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 7:391-439.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

When Do We Stop Digging? Conditions on a Fundamental Theory of Physics.Karen Crowther - 2019 - In Anthony Aguirre, Brendan Foster & Zeeya Merali (eds.), What is ‘Fundamental’? Springer. pp. 123-133.
Naturalness and Emergence.David Wallace - 2019 - The Monist 102 (4):499-524.
Two Notions of Naturalness.Porter Williams - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (9):1022-1050.
Quantum Gravity at Low Energies.David Wallace - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94:31-46.
Calling for Explanation.Dan Baras - 2022 - Oxford University Press.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Naturalness and Emergence.David Wallace - 2019 - The Monist 102 (4):499-524.
Which Fine-Tuning Arguments Are Fine?Alexei Grinbaum - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (5):615-631.
Two Notions of Naturalness.Porter Williams - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (9):1022-1050.
Naturalness, the Autonomy of Scales, and the 125GeV Higgs.Porter Williams - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51:82-96.
Why Be Natural?Jonathan Bain - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (9):898-914.
Dimensions of Naturalness.Helena Siipi - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 71-103.
Finetuned Cancellations and Improbable Theories.James D. Wells - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (5):428-443.
Naturalness in Biological Conservation.Helena Siipi - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6):457-477.
Naturalness, Intrinsicality, and Duplication.Theodore R. Sider - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-09-03

Total views
21 ( #537,129 of 2,518,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes