Suggestions to Improve the Comprehensibility of Current Definitions of Scientific Authorship for International Authors


Authors
Mohammad Hosseini
Dublin City University
Mariëtte Van Den Hoven
Utrecht University
Abstract
Much has been said about the need for improving the current definitions of scientific authorship, but an aspect that is often overlooked is how to formulate and communicate these definitions to ensure that they are comprehensible and useful for researchers, notably researchers active in international research consortia. In light of a rapid increase in international collaborations within natural sciences, this article uses authorship of this branch of sciences as an example and provides suggestions to improve the comprehensibility of the definitions of authorship in natural sciences. It assesses whether the definition of authorship provided by the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity can deal with current issues and problems of scientific authorship. Notably, problems that are experienced in project groups with researchers coming from multiple countries. Using theories developed by Jürgen Habermas and Robert Merton, a normative framework is developed to articulate ethical authorship in natural sciences. Accordingly, enriching the current definition of authorship with normative elements and using discipline-specific metaphors to communicate them are introduced as possible ways of improving the comprehensibility of the definition of authorship in international environments. Finally, this article provides a proposal to be considered in the future revisions of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.
Keywords Ethical authorship  Scientific authorship  Code of conduct  Metaphor  Virtue ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11948-019-00106-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Authorship Policies of Bioethics Journals.D. B. Resnik & Z. Master - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):424-428.
Proliferation of Authors on Research Reports in Medicine.Joost P. H. Drenth - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):469-480.
Authorship, Co‐Authorship, and Multiple Authorship.Darren Hudson Hick - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2):147-156.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-24

Total views
23 ( #404,054 of 2,285,916 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #196,884 of 2,285,916 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature